A decision of our Appeals Court, Gravlin v. Gravlin, is helpful for those facing divorce.
For collaborative divorce attorneys and divorce mediators, the decision confirms that arbitration is the viable alternative to court litigation for resolving a single issue or even taking the place of a full court trial.
In Gravlin, the Appeals Court acknowledged "... arbitration has long been recognized as a valid means of resolving disputes between divorcing parties." This Blog has often praised the value of arbitration as an alternative to divorce litigation; with Gravlin, the Appeals Court stamped an imprimatur of sorts on divorce arbitration.
While arbitration is available to replace a public court trial, it is also available if collaboration or mediation reaches a deadlock (a stalemate on one or two remaining issues); then, it is time for divorce arbitration.
When parties follow a simple process, the Appeals Court promises a "... strict standard of review [that] is high[ly] deferential..." to an arbitration award.
What does the simple process involve? The simple process requires that:
If there is any trial court review of an arbitration award, the review will be limited to determining:
The arbitrator's award was confined to what he/she was asked to decide;
(In my experience, the selection of an experienced, knowledgeable arbitrator will result in a positive review and enforcement of the award.)
For collaborative attorneys and mediators, Gravlin is another reason to recommend arbitration for settlement stalemate.
For parties facing divorce or divorce stalemate, arbitration is an alternative to a costly, lengthy and publicly litigated trial.
Anthony is a divorce arbitrator, collaborative attorney and divorce mediator. His office is in Salem. His website is: DivorcingOptions.com